After the COVID-19 pandemic halted many asylum procedures around Europe, fresh technologies are reviving these types of systems. Coming from lie recognition tools analyzed at the border to a system for confirming documents and transcribes interviews, a wide range of solutions is being employed in asylum applications. This article is exploring her latest blog just how these technologies have reshaped the ways asylum procedures will be conducted. This reveals just how asylum seekers are transformed into compelled hindered techno-users: They are asked to abide by a series of techno-bureaucratic steps also to keep up with unforeseen tiny changes in criteria and deadlines. This kind of obstructs their capacity to find their way these systems and to go after their right for cover.
It also illustrates how these types of technologies will be embedded in refugee governance: They help the ‘circuits of financial-humanitarianism’ that function through a flutter of distributed technological requirements. These requirements increase asylum seekers’ socio-legal precarity simply by hindering all of them from getting at the channels of protection. It further states that studies of securitization and victimization should be coupled with an insight in to the disciplinary mechanisms of technologies, by which migrants are turned into data-generating subjects who have are regimented by their reliability on technology.
Drawing on Foucault’s notion of power/knowledge and comarcal know-how, the article argues that these technology have an inherent obstructiveness. There is a double effect: while they assist with expedite the asylum method, they also produce it difficult meant for refugees to navigate these types of systems. They can be positioned in a ‘knowledge deficit’ that makes these people vulnerable to bogus decisions of non-governmental celebrities, and ill-informed and unreliable narratives about their instances. Moreover, that they pose new risks of’machine mistakes’ which may result in erroneous or discriminatory outcomes.
